Compass Hub
Home Page
Take a Quiz
Take a Random Quiz
Log In
Sign Up
General PolComp
Merging nations into bigger nations is desirable
Strongly Agree. We will eventually form a global unity
Agree. Organisations such as EU/Eurofederalism are good ideas
Neutral. Only if the merging nations are similar enough
Disagree. Nations should stay as they are now
Strongly Disagree. We should preserve local ethnic societal structures
The individual is more important than the society
Strongly Agree. Individual freedoms are the most important thing
Agree. A society is only as healthy as the individuals within are free
Neutral. Individual liberty and collective security should be balanced
Disagree. An individual is only as free as the society around is healthy
Strongly Disagree. The safety, organisation and homogenity of society should be first priority
Technological advancement is damaging our society
Strongly Agree. We should return to more simple lifestyles
Agree. Modern technology brought us surveillance, climate crisis, killing drones,...
Neutral. Technologies can be as beneficial as destructive. We should focus on analysing risks and chances
Disagree. Technological advancement brought us medical revolutions, global communication, green energy,...
Strongly Disagree. Humanity will eventually develop into transhumanism, space and futurism
The state shall decide on a sufficient minimum wage
Strongly Agree. The state is responsible for ensuring every working citizen a comfortable life
Agree. A reasonable min wage benefits all sides
Neutral. Ideally the market would set good wages, but sometimes the state has to step in
Disagree. Wages are mainly a matter of employee & employer
Strongly Disagree. The state should never infringe in the free market
A strong army is important
Strongly Agree. The army is defender of teh people, a national symbol for strenght and unity
Agree. The world is too unsafe to reduce our military
Neutral. Military isnt a major importance but reducing it is dangerous too
Disagree. We should maintain a military but keep it rather small
Strongly Disagree. Military is a waste of money and never is a solution to any conflict
Economic prices, capacities, productions should be planned to serve the people
Strongly Agree. The economy should serve the collective and peoples interest via central planning
Agree. In essential sectors, the state should take over planning
Neutral. Each sector is differently efficient under market or state planning
Disagree. Economy suits the people better if the people control it via supply & demand
Strongly Disagree. Planned economies have detrimentally failed
Ethnic homogenity should be preserved
Strongly Agree. Our ethnic cultural body is crucially important to preserve from any foreign influences
Agree. We have grown successful as a national society and importing other cultures undermines its stability
Neutral. Migration has risks for societies but is important as well
Disagree. Societies profit more from different cultural influences than from homogenity
Strongly Agree. There is no such thing as national cultural homogenity, we are all just humans
Corporations must be regulated to preserve us from destructive climate change
Strongly Agree. Only the collectivisation of all big companies can effectively lead to reducing emissions enough
Agree. Corporations must face regulating laws to change their ways of production
Neutral. Some broad regulations are needed while others onyl hinder the economy from developing
Disagree. Companies are perfectly capable of transforming into greener technologies, if we only let them transform
Strongly Disagree. We cannot risk the deindustrialisation of our economy for some made-up climate paranoia
Criminals are only victims of social circumstances and should be supported to get their life together again
Strongly Agree. We should try to abolish old structures such as police prisons & punishment
Agree. Rehabilitation should always be tried first before punishment is considered
Neutral. Some criminals can be rehabilitated, others can only be punished
Disagree. Criminals chose to be a threat to society and should be punished for that
Strongly Disagree. Only harsh punishment of all asocial elements is efficient to preserve our laws
Data & video surveillance are needed to protect our citizens from threats
Strongly Agree. The state has the responsibility to keep its people safe and shall use every means possible
Agree. In doubt, it is better to observe innocents than to not observe terrorists
Neutral. Neither a surveillance state nor unsafety are desirable and we should balance this out
Disagree. In doubt, keeping private data private is better than installing mass surveillance
Strongly Disagree. The state should never observe its citizens daily lives
Religions are an outdated concept
Strongly Agree. Religions are dangerous, irrational and should not be in our future society anymore
Agree. Religions should stay out of politics and main social culture, but should still be allowed privately
Neutral. Although we have science and modern consciousness to care for most things, religions still can create social unity and hope
Disagree. Religions shape our culture and society and its rights and role should be conserved
Strongly Disagree. Religion is what makes our society stick together and without it we will crumble down
Direct Democracy is too populist and sacrifices the right policies for the majority will
Strongly Agree. The population doesnt know whats good for them, leaders know better and should only listen to their knowledge
Agree. The decision with the better outcome should be preferred even if the population is against it
Neutral. Even tho the population can be impulsive at times, they still deserve a direct impact
Agree. Democracy should be improved with a more direct impact of the popular opinion
Strongly Agree. We dont need any authorities, the majority opinion of the people is all that counts
Western societies already achieved full gender equality before law. Any further measure is discriminating nonsense
Strongly Agree. Current society is trying to undermine natural social roles in the name of "equality"
Agree. We have achieved true equality before law, there is no systematic oppression anymore
Neutral. Even tho there is equality before law, there are sill broad systematic disadvantages for women (f ex in wages)
Disagree. Gender pay gap, toxic masulinity, inequality in leadership positions are still there and we need to fight it
Strongly Disagree. As long as social gender roles exist, the patriarchy will always find ways to undermine gender equality
Healthcare should be open to the private market
Strongly Agree. The free market allocates resources & prices more efficient than the state ever could
Agree. There should be a state option for the poor and advanced private options for the rest
Neutral. A strong state healthcare is important but private capital is important to refresh the health sector
Disagree. The state should handle most to all healthcare services solidarically for all
Strongly Disagree. It is dangerous and immoral to make privates profit from others sicknesses
Marriage is a sacred institution, a special bond between men & women
Strongly Agree. This is what our ancestors saw in a marriage and everythign else threatens our family values
Agree. Even tho I respect other models, alternative bonds arent true families and shouldnt be marriages
Neutral. Other models should exist equally next to marriage, but shouldnt be called one
Disagree. Marriage should be open to everyone equally
Strongly Disagree. As long as people take responsibility for each other, a marriage could also be a bond between 3 homosexual transmen without children
Rent price regulations should be implemented
Strongly Agree. But regulations arent enough, we need to collectivize the housing sector
Agree. Rent price regulations and caps/limits are reasonable to counter dangerous market effects
Neutral. Mild rent price regulations are reasonable, but the market shouldnt be discouraged
Disagree. Rent price contrrols lead to less build houses and only increase the problem
Strongly Disagree. Real estate is a private market as each other and shouldnt be infringed upon
In 100 years, we will hopefully...
Be a united transhumanist race without nations, classes, ethnicities & conquering space together
Become a global alliance of cooperating nations with advanced technology and little to no discrimination
Not change too much from now, just survive climate change and improve on other details
Preserve what we still have, our nations, families, cultures, religions, economies
Return to old social values where everyone knew their role and hopefully get rid of modern day progressive degeneracies
Communism is...
The worst and most inhumane ideology ever to be found on earth
Highly destructive and not fitting humanity, neither in theory nor in practice
Nice in theory but proved to not work in practice so we shouldnt really touch it anymore
Thinking of the right ideas and it might work someday, but for now we should stick to Social Democracy/Reformist Socialism
The only way humanity can survive in a long term and solve most current problems sustainably
Minority quotas are a needed solution
Strongly Disagree: Social roles are there for a reason and we shouldnt forcefully try hard to get unnatural equality
Disagree: Although the intention is good, it creates counter-discrimination and undermines the competence principle
Neutral: Although it isnt a perfect solution and puts identity before competence, I see its reason and necessity
Agree: Its the most effective measure to achieve more equality
Strongly Agree: We need quotas for many different groups to adequately represent our society everywhere and create equal opportunities for everyone
The biggest crisis like climate change, immigration, covid should be dealt on a global scale
Strongly Agree: A united global government or a stronger UN would be efficient to deal with global problems
Agree: We should cooperate more internationally to achieve common solutions
Neutral: We should work with other nations without giving up national sovereignity
Disagree: We should only do politics for our nation and not care for others problems
Strongly Disagree: Politics should be stronger on a local level, where its closer to the people