Take a Quiz
Take a Random Quiz
Migration Policy Test
How intense should immigrants learn our language?
Immigrants should be fluent in our language and also speak it at home/privately. Language courses obligated
Immigrants should learn our language to a sufficient level in order to take part in civil life and bureaucracy. Language courses obligated
Immigrants should learn our language on a sufficient level, but english is an alternative too if they dont manage to learn it good enough. Basic language courses obligated
Immigrants will eventually pick up certain amounts of our language, but they only should be obligated to attend basic level courses of our language
Immigrants can speak whatever they want and shouldnt be obligated to anything in this aspect. Communication goes beyond the one state language
Should our country work with immigration capacity limits (especially towards asylum refugees)
It would be inhumane to restrict the entry into our country for people that are being forced out of their home, even because of our policies. No one is illegal
We should not think of arbitrary specific capacity numbers and welcome immigrants openly
We should work with local area capacity limits for refugees. Local areas know best which capacities they have, but such capacity limits are a necessary evil
Our nation has a natuiral cultural capacity tpo preserve our cultural and civil stability. We should impose this hard capacity limit to our nation
Our country only can afford taking in the best educated ones and only in a very limited number. We should not become a heaven for immigrants
How open should immigrants be allowed to live their culture?
All immigrants should adapt to our home culture and should recieve obligatory courses in that. Also they should refrain from expressing their culture to our civil society
Their cultural expression should be limited to private space and they should at least be able to integrate into our culture on a basic level
Its ideal if an immigrant adapts to our culture instead of isolation while still expressing their culture to our society, which can be an enrichment too
Immigrants should only be obligated to adapt to the basic rules of our society while not being restricted to express their culture wherever they want as long as it doesnt violate our civil security or basic moral standards
Immigrants are born with their culture and should not be restricted to continue expressing it in any way or being obligated to integrate into our culture
What conditions do you favour for immigration?
No conditions, everyone should freely choose where they want to live and every state should be open to anyone who wants to live where they want
While I am open towards migration, I still want refugees to proof their asylum status and immigrants to be self-responsible to achieve a stable life without the state needing to assist much
I am in favour of a soft point-based immigration. Certain standards need to be meet, like good education or basic language skills
I favour a hard point-based immigration policy, where the appliant needs to proof very high language, cultural, educational skills
We should only apply migration status to the very best and most useful people, the rest isnt of need to us and can try their luck at another place or should at best staywhere they come from
How should we dael with "Parallel Societies"?
Our society is one cultural unit, grown through the historic ultural traditions over hundreds of years and we cannot allow any parallel cultures that are a threat to our own
We should avoid major parallel societies where certain cultures stay among themselves, apart from our society and begin to develop their own uncontrollable (and criminal) structures
We should allow certain parallel societies as long as we still have organisational control over them and as long as they dont impose a threat onto our society and safety
I see the advantages of parllel societies as a multicultural pot of new influences, possibilities and cultures that can enrichen our daily life
It is inherently wrong to differenciate and label local societies based on their culture. We should be more concerned of investigating the wealth and perspectives of societies and assist those who are poorer.All cultures and forms of cultures are valid
Should we ban immigrants from certain cultures/religions for security or cultural reasons?
Everyone has the same right to migrate to wherever they want. Generalisations based on cultures are inherently wrong and dont respect individuality
Im against general resitrictions or bans from more dangerous regions, as especially from these regions, people try to flee from their circumstances and seek a more safe life
Im against general resitrictions or bans from more dangerous regions, because even from generally threatful cultures there can be individuals who we would be safe for taking in. Its still about the individual, not their culture
Yes, we should ban entry from certain regions who are simply too dangerous and too much of a potential threat to let people from these cultures into our society
We should only allow immigrants into our country that come from culturally similarregions to not contaminate our society and culture with people from foreign traditions, religions and cultures
Should we allow welfare to immigrants/refugees?
State Welfare should only be accessible for our own people. All others can get out of our country again if they cant sustain themselves
State Welfare should be connected to citizenship and to paying into welfare insurance systems for at least 10 years for immigrants
State Welfare should be connected to citizenship and to paying into welfare insurance systems for at least 2 years for immigrants. We should give a lower basic welfare to accepted refugees additionally
We should give State Welfare to anyone who is in our country since 2 years and the same amount to refugees too, but immediatelyt
Everyone who is in need of financial assistance should get the same help by state welfare as our citizens too. There is no difference because of origin or official status
Should immigrants/refugees who arrive and already have family members here, be let in automatically or not?
Everyone should be allowed to enter our country unconditionally, and the state has to care especially to unite families within our country
Yes, when the arriving immigrants can prove their family status, they should get reunited with their family members without major barriers or bureaucracy
The state should still prove the legitimacy of immigration for every incoming family member individually, and if the required standards to immigrate arent fulfilled, then the state should send them home again. If the standards are meet, the state should reunify the family members
No, every individual gets analysed on their right to enter our country individually and even if the requirements are fulfilled, the state can organise their location based on the nations standards, independant of if they have family here
Families shouldnt split up to emigrate in the first place. Either they come as a unit at the same time, or they should be handled by the state seperately
How do we handle immigrants/refugees whose residential status is expired (expired VISA or reason of asylum not existant anymore)?
Everyone who loses their legal residential status has to go home immediately again, also with forceful methods. We cannot tolerate any illegal immigrants
Those without legal residential status should be given a certain time until they can regain the status, then we should send them home
Refugees who lost their status should be given opportunity to apply for citizenship/work immigration status. Otherwise we should send those home again
Unless being a big threat to our society/safety, illegal immigrants should be tolerated in our country. They dont bother anyone
Everyone should have unconditional legal residential status in our country. There is no such thing as an illegal immigrant
How should we deal with immigrants/refugees who become criminal?
No criminality should be tolerated at all! If we even are so gracious to offer them being in our society, they should be so thankful and respectful to unconditionally follow our law
Every crime above a small-scale should be punished with expiration of residential status and we then should send them home again
Major crimes and threats to our society should be considered with a punishment to send them home
We should only send immigrants home if they committed a serious threat to our society and if their homeland is safe
Everyone should have the legitimacy to live in our ciountry, even if that means to punish them for crimes with our law in our prisons. But we shouldnt send them home to potential countries who execute them or force them to fight wars